A634.5.4.RB - Is Marketing Evil?
After reading the article
concerning marketing ethics and business practices, it makes questioning a
company and how they function reasonable and justifiable because many large
corporations intentionally or unintentionally deceive their customers. However,
do the guidelines make a difference to the marketers? This question is
debatable because one does not want to believe a company or organization will
intentionally deceive them and cause harm to the client. Farrell (n.d.) shared
that it is important to understand how people make business ethics decisions in
an organization. In addition, Farrell (n.d.) explained that the organization
has to understand what drivers of behaviors are, and how those align with
integrity and goals. A company can and should have ethical guidelines in place
to guide their employees to uphold the best practice but that does not mean
they will. There are several driving forces behind unethical practices, which
push employees to make decisions they would not normally make, to include meeting
quotas, meeting difficult goals, and getting the next big sale.
Wible (2011) explained
that marketers commonly defend their actions by saying they are simply
supplying what the customer wants and needs. However, this can corner a
customer and the employee justifying their actions by stating it is what the
customer wanted. How can companies
balance their need to win with ethical practices? Knauss (2010) explained that
companies have establish strict ethical processes for customer-facing teams and
support their folds, all with appropriate checks and balances; this provides
transparent marketing. In addition, he went on to explain (2010) that in order
to truly develop trust with customers, companies must walk the walk. If a
company maintains their standards of business practices then what they set out
to do should be achievable.
We
are reaching age where companies such as target, Walmart, and amazon track purchases
concerning how customers spend their money. This can unnerving as a consumer
because there are eyes with every move, including what is purchase at the store
by corporations. Is it ethical? This can go one of two ways. First, a company
is trying to understand their clients purchasing habits in order to fill and
keep stock of wanted/ needed items. On the other hand, this can be viewed as
over stepping the boundaries of the customer and be unethical. Is this
unethical, it depends how far a corporation is willing to go and what
boundaries they will cross to get the information about a consumer.
Finally,
in order to manage the ethical aspects of marketing as the leader/ manager of
an organization, I would stress the importance of balancing the required work
and upholding company standards. There is zero benefit to stepping outside of
standards when the guidelines of checks and balances are in place for a reason.
Farrell (n.d.) stated that the value of a positive reputation is difficult to
quantify, but it is an important intangible asset that all marketers
understand. He went on to explain that a single negative incident could
influence perceptions of a corporation’s image and reputation instantly and for
years afterward.
Overall,
the ethical practices of an organization can influence how employees treat
their customers. By forcing employees to meet quotas, achieve unattainable
deadlines, or have customers buy into items they do not need in order to boost
sales, pushes them to make unethical decisions to support the organization. It
is important for businesses to set their standards and walk the walk in order
to show their clients they are reputable and acting their best interest.
Farrell, L. (n.d.). Marketing
Ethics. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from http://college.cengage.com/
business/modules/marktngethics.pdf
Knauss, D. (2010, January 19). The Role Of Business Ethics In Relationships With Customers.
Retrieved June 27, 2017, from Forbes website: https://www.forbes.com/2010/01/19/
knauss-clorox-ethics-leadership-citizenship-ethics.html
Wible, A. (2011). It's all on sale:
Marketing ethics and the perpetually fooled. Journal
of Business Ethics, 99,
17-21.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/10.1007/s10551-011-1162-9
Comments
Post a Comment